Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Double Standards?

December 17th 2009 02:16
Voodoo
Sexist? Apparently not!
"It's sexy and eye-catching", says Janet Hogan, 42, co-creative director of the advertising agency Streamline, who created the campaign for her client Kolotex.

"Women love the ballsiness of it."

"Since we can be sure that a billboard featuring a man walking two naked women on a dog leash would be illegal in this country on the grounds of being demeaning to one sex, I'm sure that by the principles of equality and justice, that the relevant censorship board in question would have made an equivalent judgment about the Voodoo hosiery ad".


This outdoor advertisement features an image of a gloved and stiletto-booted woman wearing (Voodoo) tights under a short Dalmatian-patterned dress, walking behind two crouching men, naked except for dog-style collars, the leashes of which are held by the woman. Accompanying text reads: Voodoo Winter Hosiery.'

Now before the hounds start baying at the moon and those who for want of another cause leap to the defence of how this kind of sexism has crestfallen women for decades - does this make it right?

For your amusement and edification - I would present one such censorship boards response (in part) to a complaint.


THE DETERMINATION

The Advertising Standards Board ('the Board') considered whether this advertisement breaches Section 2 of the Advertiser Code of Ethics ('the Code').


The Board considered that while some people clearly had different perceptions of the advertisement, it represented a satirical comment on a patriarchal world.

It determined that, as such, the content of the advertisement did not contravene the Code in relation to either the portrayal of people or the portrayal of sex, sexuality and/or nudity.

With the Board finding that the advertisement did not breach the Code on any other grounds, the complaint was dismissed.

Hmmmm . . . . I guess the gloves are off . . . and the rules only apply to some.
66
Vote


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
3 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Journeywoman

December 17th 2009 23:03
Agreed. Equality between the sexes is about equal respect, not about equal disrespect.

There is nothing progressive whatsoever about this campaign. There's no point in objectifying men in the same way that women have been objectified for centuries, because sure, it may be satire but I think our society should be attempting to move beyond sexual objectification altogether.

Great post MNG.

Comment by Mr Nice Guy

December 18th 2009 04:25
Journeywoman

I just don't understand what's so difficult about the concept of equality and respect men vs women, black vs white . . . et al

Thanks for the rap - it's appreciated.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
4 Posts
18 Posts
9 Posts
846 Posts dating from June 2007
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Mr Nice Guy's Blogs

8166 Vote(s)
169 Comment(s)
90 Post(s)
Moderated by Mr Nice Guy
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]